Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams Amenities: The Confirmed Infrastructure Behind 1,188 Apartments
The developer's project data for Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams confirms a 2,976.93 sq m civic amenity allocation, 35,313.68 sq m of landscape, 800 new trees, 6,056 parking bays, a 2,020 KLD sequencing-batch-reactor sewage treatment plant against 1,982 KLD of wastewater, a 1,020 cu m sump with 22 recharge pits, 7.63 MT/day of solid waste handling, and DG plus transformer provision — and confirms no clubhouse, no pool, no gymnasium and no sports facility of any kind. In the same Bengaluru context, Total Environment Down by the Water helps buyers read clubhouse, landscape, sports, and wellness features through everyday use rather than brochure quantity.
That second clause is the one this page exists for. Every third-party listing for the scheme marketed as Total Environment Sarjapur Road carries an amenity list. None of it appears in the statutory documents; what does appear is a quantified infrastructure schedule.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Project · developer | Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams, marketed as Total Environment Sarjapur Road · Total Environment Building Systems Private Limited |
| Location | Thigalachowdenahalli + Dommasandra, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal Taluk, Bengaluru Urban 562125 |
| Land · homes | 90,059.57 sq m gross (22.25 acres) · net site 87,935.90 sq m · 1,188 apartments in 6 towers, plus 1 commercial tower |
| Confirmed amenity provision | 2,976.93 sq m civic amenities · 35,313.68 sq m landscape · 800 trees · 6,056 bays, three basements (four commercial) |
| Confirmed services | 2,202 KLD water · 1,982 KLD wastewater · 2,020 KLD SBR STP, dual plumbing · 1,020 cu m sump · 22 pits · 7.63 MT/day waste · DG and transformer provision, no kW or KVA filed |
| RERA · status | Not registered as of August 2026 · pre-launch · stated completion 28 February 2030 |
What the Filing Confirms, and What It Does Not
| Confirmed in the project data | Circulating but not in the filing |
|---|---|
| Landscaped area — 35,313.68 sq m | Clubhouse — area, levels, facilities |
| Civic amenities — 2,976.93 sq m | Pool, lap pool, kids' pool |
| Surface parking as a land-use head | Gymnasium, fitness studio, spa |
| Internal driveways, fire tender access | Indoor games, squash, badminton |
| Sewage treatment — 2,020 KLD, SBR | Co-working, business centre, banquet |
| DG backup and transformer provision | Amphitheatre, jogging track, pet park |
| Sump 1,020 cu m · 22 pits · 800 trees | Green certification; solar of any kind |
| 6,056 bays · 7.63 MT/day of waste | Concierge, valet, any named brand |
The right-hand column is not a prediction that these facilities will be absent. A campus of 1,188 large-format apartments will carry a substantial shared-amenity programme; the segment cannot be sold without one. The point is that none of it is committed in any document a buyer can currently see. Under section 3 of the RERA Act 2016 an unregistered project may not lawfully be advertised or sold, so no registered brochure or amenity annexure yet exists. Read the right-hand column as the anticipated programme for the segment, and the left as the project.
The 2,976.93 sq m Civic Amenity Allocation at Total Environment Sarjapur Road
| Measure | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Civic amenity area | filed | 2,976.93 sq m |
| In acres · square feet | ÷ 4,046.86 · × 10.7639 | 0.736 acres · 32,043 sq ft |
| Share of net site | ÷ 87,935.90 | 3.39% |
| Share of gross land | ÷ 90,059.57 | 3.31% |
| Per apartment | ÷ 1,188 | 2.51 sq m — 26.97 sq ft |
Twenty-seven square feet per home. Branded Bengaluru high-rises in this band typically market a clubhouse at 20 to 40 sq ft per apartment, so the allocation sits mid-band.
There is a definitional trap worth naming. In Karnataka planning practice, "civic amenity area" carries two meanings: a civic amenity site reservation, set aside under the zoning regulations and in layout approvals ordinarily surrendered to the planning authority for a school, dispensary or community hall — leaving the association's control entirely — or an internal amenity provision, the clubhouse and shared facilities retained by residents. The filing states an area, not a meaning. On group housing the second reading is more probable, but the first cannot be excluded, and the difference is the entire value of the number. Ask which it is in writing, and whether it sits inside or outside the saleable area you are charged for.
Where it sits in the land budget is also unstated. The schedule closes on the net site as three heads: landscape 35,313.68 sq m, ground coverage 29,140.90 sq m, and a derived balance of 23,481.32 sq m of driveways, fire access, service yards and hardscape. If the civic amenity is carved out of that balance, residual circulation land falls to 23,481.32 − 2,976.93 = 20,504.39 sq m, 23.32% of the net site; if it is a built block, its footprint already sits inside the coverage figure — a three-quarter-acre difference in ground plane.
Power at Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams: The Largest Gap in the Filing
The project data confirms DG backup and transformer provision and states no capacity for either.
Basement ventilation alone is a small power station. The parking envelope runs to roughly 196,820 sq m of enclosed basement (6,056 bays at a gross 32.5 sq m each, including aisles, ramps and plant), and mechanical ventilation with smoke extraction carries roughly 8 to 12 W per sq m:
196,820 × 8 W = 1,575 kW · 196,820 × 12 W = 2,362 kW
That is before a lift moves or an apartment is energised.
Residential demand, derived. Apartments in the predicted 2,400–3,500 sq ft band typically carry an 8–12 kW sanctioned load each. At 10 kW, 1,188 homes give 11,880 kW connected, and at a diversity factor of 0.35–0.45, 4,160 to 5,350 kW of maximum demand. Add lifts, pumps, STP blowers, irrigation and lighting across seven towers, plus a commercial tower whose load per square metre exceeds an apartment's, and campus maximum demand lands well into five figures of kilowatts — which needs a dedicated HT feeder and an in-project substation carrying multiple transformers.
The regime, not the presence, is what matters. A life-safety-and-common-areas-only regime — lifts, fire systems, pumps, basement ventilation, corridor lighting, STP — sizes at roughly 2,500 to 3,500 kW here; full backup including a per-home allocation, at roughly 6,000 to 9,000 kW. The branded segment now expects the second, in kW per apartment. Ask for that number, and whether the commercial tower sits on a separate DG bus — a 147 m office tower with a sharply peaked weekday profile sharing generator plant with 1,188 homes carries a permanent cost-sharing consequence.
And there is a load nobody has counted. Karnataka's electric-vehicle policy framework and the model building bye-laws require 20% of bays to be EV-ready: 6,056 × 20% = 1,211 bays. At a modest 3.3 kW charger each, that is 3,996 kW if every point drew at once — comparable to the entire diversified residential demand above. At this bay count EV provision is a substation-scale decision, not a socket. Ask whether the 20% is wired, ducted or merely "provisioned".
Water Management at Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams: 2,202 KLD and a Gap
STP headroom is 38 KLD — 1.92%. Installed 2,020 KLD against 1,982 KLD generated is close to zero redundancy, which makes modularity the critical unanswered question: one train, or two or three. A single-train plant taken down for servicing at that margin has nowhere to send the flow — below a residential basement, an odour event affecting every home at once.
Wastewater return runs at 90.0% (1,982 ÷ 2,202), at the top of the 80–90% band normally applied, which makes the treated-water loop load-bearing rather than decorative — and makes dual plumbing a consequential confirmation. It is a second, physically separate reticulation carrying treated water to every cistern and irrigation point: expensive, built into the structure rather than retrofitted, and the strongest single indicator that the recycling loop is designed to actually run. The sump holds 0.46 days of demand (1,020 ÷ 2,202): peak-shaving buffer, not reserve.
The gap the numbers do not close
| Component | Working | KLD |
|---|---|---|
| Residential domestic, 135 lpcd × 4 persons | 1,188 × 4 × 135 ÷ 1,000 | 641.5 |
| — of which flushing, at 45 lpcd | 1,188 × 4 × 45 ÷ 1,000 | 213.8 |
| Landscape irrigation, 5 mm/day over 35,313.68 sq m | × 0.005 | 176.6 |
| Residual — commercial, common areas, losses | 2,202 − 641.5 − 176.6 | 1,383.9 |
Residential demand is 29.1% of the total. The residual is the problem: derived commercial floor area is 1.69 to 1.84 million sq ft (working under parking below), which at office norms of 45 lpcd and one person per 10 sq m supports roughly 430 to 560 KLD — about a third of it.
Two readings reconcile it, and the filing does not say which applies. The first, and more probable, is that 2,202 KLD is a gross figure counting recycled water alongside fresh — the standard convention in environmental application forms. On that reading the fresh draw is far smaller, the arithmetic closes, and the 90% return and dual plumbing make sense. The second is that the commercial component includes water-intensive uses rather than pure office. Ask for the fresh-water versus treated-water split, in KLD. On a site outside the Cauvery service area, dependent on borewell, tanker and in-project recycling, the fresh number determines what a dry year costs the association.
Recharge, and what 22 pits can and cannot do
Twenty-two pits is one per 4,094 sq m of gross site — just under one per acre — and one per 1,605 sq m of landscaped ground: a sound density for this corridor. But a standard pit of 2 m diameter and 3 m depth holds about 9.4 cu m, and at a 40% media void gives roughly 3.8 cu m of storage, or about 83 cu m across all 22.
Bengaluru's one-hour, high-return-period rainfall of roughly 65 mm over 90,059.57 sq m at a 0.7 runoff coefficient = 4,098 cu m in a single hour. Sump plus pits = 1,020 + 83 = 1,103 cu m — 26.9% of one design-storm hour.
Recharge here is a groundwater and water-balance measure, not the flood strategy. That is the tertiary nala crossing the parcel, its 15 m buffer, the roughly 220 m of proposed realignment and the drainage discharging into it — none of which has been through Environmental Clearance scrutiny, since no application appears on the public portal as of August 2026. Ask for the storm-water drawing, the invert levels, and how discharge from roughly 197,000 sq m of basement slab meets the channel.
Solid Waste at 7.63 MT/Day: A Bulk Generator Seventy-Six Times Over
7,630 kg of waste leaves this campus every day. Karnataka's solid waste regime sets the bulk-generator threshold at 100 kg/day, exceeded here by a factor of 76.3 — making in-situ processing of the wet fraction a statutory obligation.
| Metric | Working | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Per apartment if residential-only | 7,630 ÷ 1,188 | 6.42 kg/day |
| Plausible residential generation | 4,752 residents × 0.4–0.6 kg/capita | 1,901 – 2,851 kg/day |
| Residential share of the stream | 24.9% – 37.4% | |
| Wet fraction at 55% | 7,630 × 0.55 | 4,197 kg/day |
Two-thirds to three-quarters of the stream is therefore not residential. It is the commercial tower — the same conclusion the water and parking figures reach independently.
The compost surplus is a real operational question. An organic waste converter handling 4,197 kg/day of wet waste yields roughly 10–15% by weight as finished compost — 420 to 630 kg/day, or 153,000 to 230,000 kg a year. Against 35,313.68 sq m of landscape at a generous 2 kg per sq m per year, the campus absorbs about 70,600 kg a year. It therefore produces 2.2 to 3.3 times more compost than its own gardens can use — a surplus needing a contracted offtake, or it accumulates in a service yard and becomes an odour complaint. Ask where the segregation room, the converter and the baling area sit relative to residential lobbies; on a three-basement campus this is almost certainly below grade, which makes ventilation a design question.
Parking at Total Environment Sarjapur Road: 6,056 Bays, 5.10 Per Apartment
6,056 ÷ 1,188 = 5.10 bays per apartment. No residential scheme in Bengaluru is planned at five bays a home. The ratio is a campus figure, and unpicking it is the useful arithmetic.
Zoning regulations for group housing at this unit size require broadly one car space per dwelling plus a 10–20% visitor allowance: 1,188 + 20% = 1,426 bays minimum. The filing provides 4.25× that.
The split depends entirely on commercial floor area, which is not filed and must be derived — an estimate stacked on an estimate. Total built-up is 680,220.99 sq m; less the 196,820 sq m basement envelope leaves 483,401 sq m above ground; less residential at 1,188 × 263–275 sq m super built-up (the corroborated 2,430–3,240 sq ft band and the predicted 2,400–3,500 sq ft band respectively) leaves a residual commercial and shared area of roughly 157,000 to 170,000 sq m — 1.69 to 1.84 million sq ft.
| Method | Commercial bays | Residual residential bays | Per apartment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Office norm 1 bay per 750 sq ft | 2,253 – 2,453 | 3,603 – 3,803 | 3.03 – 3.20 |
| Office norm 1 bay per 1,000 sq ft | 1,690 – 1,840 | 4,216 – 4,366 | 3.55 – 3.68 |
| Service-load method, 61–71% non-residential | 3,694 – 4,300 | 1,756 – 2,362 | 1.48 – 1.99 |
The methods disagree, and both are printed. The service-load method — reading parking, water and waste together to infer a 60–70% commercial share — assumes 1.5 to 2.0 bays per home, a mid-market norm. For apartments of 2,400–3,500 sq ft, two to three bays plus visitor and staff parking is the segment reality, which is what the office-norm methods produce. The honest answer is a range: the residential entitlement sits between roughly 1.5 and 3.7 bays per apartment, a 2.5× spread the filed data cannot narrow. That bay count is a material term of sale, and on a mixed-use campus a permanent point of friction with the commercial owner. Get it in writing before booking.
What the parking costs the project: 196,820 ÷ 680,220.99 = 28.94%. Nearly three in every ten square metres built here is car storage — which is what buys 40.16% landscape.
One inconsistency to flag: the confirmed schedule names surface parking as a distinct land-use head, while the 6,056 bays are described across three basements. Both can be true — visitor, drop-off and service bays typically sit outside the basement count — but the filing states neither the surface area nor the surface bay count. Ask for the split; at-grade parking comes out of the balance allocation and out of the ground-level landscape.
Fire, Life Safety and Security on a Mixed-Use Campus
Every tower here is a high-rise by a wide margin — 112.80 m for T1–T5, 115.80 m for T6, 147.00 m commercial — against the 45 m threshold at which the high-rise regime engages. Refuge areas are required every 24 m above 24 m: four levels in each residential tower (roughly floors 8, 16, 24 and 32) and six in the commercial tower. These are often marketed as sky decks. They are not — they are code-mandated open-sided areas that must remain unobstructed.
External rescue from a hydraulic platform reaches roughly 70 m in this city, so everything above about level 23 depends entirely on internal systems — pressurised staircases, fire lifts, wet risers, sprinklers, and a static fire-water reserve with terrace tanks. The filing states a 1,020 cu m rainwater sump; it does not separately state a fire-water reserve, and those are different tanks with different draw-down rules. Ask for the fire NOC scheme and the static storage volume. Fire tender access is confirmed, and the geometry supports it: an illustrative 1,200 m perimeter-and-spur loop at 6 m wide consumes about 7,200 sq m, close to a third of the balance allocation.
Security is where the mixed use bites. Nothing about a security system is filed, so what follows is structural rather than specification. A 22.25-acre parcel roughly 300 m a side has a perimeter of about 1,200 m. On a purely residential campus that perimeter is the security boundary and one gatehouse controls it. Here it cannot be, because a G+34 commercial tower with 1.7 million-plus sq ft of leasable area brings thousands of daily visitors through the gate who have no business in the residential half. That forces a two-boundary design: a separate commercial arrival from the arterial frontage; a physically separated basement, the commercial tower's fourth level being the tell; and access control at each of the six residential lobbies, the only arrangement that works once the outer boundary is porous by design.
Ask how many manned posts there are, whether commercial and residential CCTV run to one control room or two, and whether the association or the commercial owner controls the site gate. For a same-locality reference on how a large branded campus in Dommasandra handles arrival and boundary, Nambiar District 25 sits roughly 1.56 km away and is the nearest directly comparable scheme.
Sustainability at Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams: Quantified, and Silent
The environmental provisions here are unusually well quantified for a pre-launch scheme — 1,982 KLD of wastewater against 2,020 KLD of capacity is a claim that can be checked, where "eco-friendly living" cannot. Landscape at 40.16% of the net site is the load-bearing green claim; 800 trees is 0.67 per apartment and one per 44.14 sq m of green area; dual plumbing is structural rather than a retrofit; the 22 pits sit at about one per acre. Green certification is not stated — no IGBC, LEED or GRIHA claim appears. Nor is solar, not even as "proposed".
Solar is the conspicuous silence. Aggregate tower roof area is on the order of 13,250 sq m; at roughly 10 sq m per kWp that is about 1,325 kWp, generating perhaps 5,960 kWh a day at Bengaluru irradiance — a real contribution to common-area load. But roof space here is contested by overhead tanks, lift machine rooms, terrace amenity and, on a developer whose signature is planted terraces, garden. The question is not whether solar is possible but whether the roof has been allocated. The filing does not say.
The tree programme is planted for maturity, not for handover. One tree per 44.14 sq m is a notional 6.6 m grid — large-species spacing, deliberately open, and defensible from a practice that designs its landscape in-house. It also means the canopy in the first published render will not be the canopy at possession. The species schedule is not in the filing, and that is the gap worth pressing hardest: eight hundred fast ornamentals score identically on a spreadsheet to eight hundred large-crowned natives and deliver none of the shade, the bank-holding on the nala buffer, or the link to the wider green network. Ask for the species list and a written three-to-five-year maintenance obligation carried into the association handover.
The Lifestyle Amenities: What to Expect, and What to Get in Writing
Nothing here is confirmed; it is set out because a buyer needs the segment norm to judge what is offered. For a campus of this size and band, the anticipated programme would ordinarily run to a multi-level clubhouse with a lap pool and a leisure pool, a gymnasium and studios, indoor games and a multipurpose hall, a co-working suite, children's play, a walking loop through the green spine, and one or two outdoor courts. None of it appears in the filing, and no listing carrying it is sourced to anything better than another listing — the same listings that carry "8 towers", "30 acres", "1,500 units", "80% open space" and "RERA approved", every one contradicted by the statutory documents.
At brand level, evidenced across the delivered portfolio rather than for this project, Total Environment's signature is consistent: a garden with every home regardless of floor, planted terraces built into the structure, exposed brick and natural stone, and fully furnished handover using furniture from its own manufacturing operation. Those are characteristics of completed work since 1996 — a reasonable expectation, not a specification for this scheme. For how that signature reads on a large single parcel elsewhere in the city, Down by the Water at Jakkur is the group's nearest large-format comparison.
The infrastructure schedule on this page is quantified and checkable. The lifestyle programme is not yet a document. Do not pay for the second on the strength of the first.
What to Verify Before You Commit
- RERA. There is no Karnataka RERA registration for this project as of August 2026, and none has been applied for. Under section 3 of the RERA Act 2016, marketing and sale are unlawful until registration is granted. Registration is also the moment an amenity schedule becomes an enforceable annexure. Verify at rera.karnataka.gov.in.
- The 2,976.93 sq m civic amenity area — resident clubhouse, or a reservation surrendered to the authority? Inside or outside saleable area?
- The DG regime — kW per apartment, whether the commercial tower shares the bus, and whether transformer capacity was sized for the 20% EV-ready requirement.
- STP modularity at 1.92% headroom, the fresh versus treated water split in KLD, and the fire-water static reserve stated separately from the rainwater sump.
- Residential-only parking — bay count, per-apartment allocation, visitor allowance, surface-versus-basement split — and waste offtake for the compost surplus.
- The maintenance-charge apportionment formula between the association and the commercial owner. Where the plant is sized 60–70% for a commercial tower, this is a material term.
- Environmental Clearance. At 680,220.99 sq m of built-up, SEIAA Karnataka clearance is required. No application appears on the public portal, and the nala realignment and buffer conditions are set there.
Nothing on this page is an approval, a price or a commitment. It is the infrastructure arithmetic of a pre-launch filing, published so it can be checked against the sanctioned plan and the registered agreement when those exist.
Contact the Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams desk
Ask for the brochure, the cost sheet when it is issued, floor plates and a site visit for Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams.
Total Environment Butterfly of Dreams amenities — questions
Which amenities are actually confirmed?
Only what appears in the filing: landscaped open area, civic amenity provision, internal driveways and fire-tender access, the 2,020 KLD SBR sewage treatment plant, DG backup and transformers, 22 recharge pits, the 1,020 cu m sump, 6,056 bays and 800 proposed trees. A clubhouse, pool, gymnasium, sports courts, co-working and spa all appear in third-party listings and none appears in the statutory documents. That does not mean they will be absent — it means nobody has committed to them in a document you could hold them to.
What water and sewage infrastructure is planned, and where does the water come from?
The developer's project data records water demand of 2,202 KLD, wastewater of 1,982 KLD, a 2,020 KLD sequencing-batch-reactor STP, a 1,020 cu m rainwater sump, 22 recharge pits and 7.63 MT/day of solid waste. Three sums matter: installed STP capacity sits 1.9% above generation, almost no margin; at 1,982 against 2,202 KLD, 90% of every litre drawn returns as sewage, making the plant rather than the borewell the operating constraint; and 1,020 cu m against 2,202 KLD is about eleven hours of supply. The site is in Anekal Taluk, outside the Cauvery Stage V service area, so there is no confirmed BWSSB connection — expect borewell, tanker, the in-project STP and recharge, and treat this as the material infrastructure risk here.
What is Total Environment's design signature, and does it apply here?
The brand's signature is a private garden with every home regardless of floor, exposed brick and natural stone as primary materials, and fully furnished handover using the group's own furniture and fenestration. That is what the developer has built elsewhere and it is a reasonable expectation here — but it is not a specification for this project, because none has been published. The developer's Jakkur project is the closest analogue in materials and unit format.
Is Butterfly of Dreams the same project as Total Environment Sarjapur Road?
Yes — one parcel, two names. "Butterfly of Dreams" is the name the client has confirmed directly with the developer, while third-party listings market the same land as Total Environment Sarjapur Road, some using the working codename "Echoes". The poetic name carries no public footprint yet: absent from the developer's projects page and from a 9,876-row parse of the Karnataka RERA registry. We carry both — the project's own name, and the geographic name the market uses.
When will it launch, and when is possession?
Launch is stated as Q3 2026 and completion as 28 February 2030. Neither binds anyone, because a possession date becomes enforceable only once entered on a RERA registration, and none exists. With nothing filed with the regulator and no environmental clearance application on record as of mid-August 2026, a Q3 2026 launch would require both to move quickly. Read 28 February 2030 as a planning assumption, not a commitment.
What does pre-launch mean here, and can I book an apartment now?
A pre-launch is the stage before statutory permissions exist — no RERA registration, often no environmental clearance, no sanctioned plan, and therefore no lawful sale — whereas a soft launch normally means approvals are in place and the developer is selling quietly before advertising. This project is pre-launch in the strict sense, so you cannot lawfully book. Money asked for now, whether called an expression-of-interest amount, a pre-launch advantage or a token, is being collected for an unregistered project, will not sit in a RERA-mandated project account, and is recoverable only on the terms of a private document. Ask what the refund term is, in writing, first.